Vợ thích mùi đàn ông
8,710,394 99%
Married to estrus sweaty man invites a man from their own
9 năm trước đây
,jpeg/007/542/819/v2/320x180.205.jpg)
,jpeg/008/589/430/v2/320x180.225.jpg)
,jpeg/009/348/541/v2/320x180.206.jpg)
,jpeg/009/488/135/1280x720.5.jpg)
,jpeg/007/062/770/v2/320x180.222.jpg)
,jpeg/001/608/678/v2/320x180.285.jpg)
,jpeg/008/767/613/v2/320x180.226.jpg)
,jpeg/023/493/697/v2/320x180.212.jpg)
,jpeg/020/559/499/v2/320x180.244.jpg)
,jpeg/000/354/992/v2/320x180.214.jpg)
,jpeg/014/081/584/1280x720.3.jpg)
Bình luận
39
Has anyone noticed that common among the title of these and a plethora of American porn videos is the mentioning of a "wife" or "daughter" either straying or something relevant to the female in the video being the perpetrator. Even if there's censorship in some of them, the male's face tends to be censored or he's wearing a mask of some sort. The female is very seldom or rarely censored. Ironically, in so called "censored" porn videos, the genitalia of male and female are censored, yet the face or identity of the female is NEVER censored. It makes no sense to censor the genitals of the female, but expose her identity. That's fucken stupid. (HYPOCRITICAL)